The New Poets: Voices, Identities, and Transformations in Indian English Poetry
Historical/Literary Background
The shift toward modernism in Indian poetry was catalyzed by the political and economic uncertainties of the 1930s, which forced a re-thinking among "progressives" and "proletarians," culminating in a literature of protest and disillusionment
The Dual Traditions: Modern Indian poetry is sustained by two distinct historical currents
The Linguistic Predicament: The Indo-Anglian poet navigates the peculiar perplexity of striving for self-expression in English
Emergence of the New Poets
The movement gained early traction in the 1930s with poets like Shahid Suhrawardy, who employed modernist techniques like allusiveness and multilinguism to communicate disgust with urban vulgarity
Editorial Patronage: The movement achieved significant currency and respectability after 1947 when C. R. Mandy began publishing Indo-Anglian verse in the Illustrated Weekly of India
The Writers Workshop: The movement's institutional center was the Writers Workshop, founded in Calcutta in 1958 by P. Lal
Major Characteristics
The "new" poetry is defined by several foundational characteristics and theoretical priorities established by the Writers Workshop collective:
Rejection of Romanticism: The new poets explicitly rejected propaganda, imitation, and vague romanticism
Emphasis on Concreteness: They valued a vital language built on concrete, relevant images rather than "vague immensities"
The Private Voice: There was a strong preference for the lyric form and the private, confessional voice, characterized by earnest self-exploration and outspokenness
Professional Discipline: Writing poetry was treated not as casual expression, but as an exacting discipline and a consecrated, full-time vocation
Important Poets
A diverse array of highly individualistic practitioners defines this era:
👉Hasan Shahid Suhrawardy
- 👉P. R. Kaikini
- 👉Nissim Ezekiel
- 👉Dom Moraes
- 👉P. Lal
- 👉Kamala Das
- 👉A. K. Ramanujan
- 👉R. Parthasarathy
- 👉Arun Kolatkar
- 👉Jayanta Mahapatra
- 👉Shiv K. Kumar
- 👉Keki N. Daruwalla
- 👉Dilip Chitre
Themes
Thematic concerns in the new poetry reflect a tense, often clinical negotiation between the human body, the material world, and overarching existential anxieties:
Urban Alienation and Biopolitics: A predominant theme is the dehumanizing impact of the city, depicted as a "barbaric" space of purgatorial lanes, sickness, and the systemic loss of human verities
Technoscientific Dread: Anticipating later posthumanist anxieties, these poets express acute dread regarding the nuclear age, viewing modern civilization as a clockwork nightmare plagued by the horrors of the Bomb and the threat of mutual defeat
Psychological Trauma and Sensuality: Many poems obsessively explore the physical body, disease, the failure of intimacy, and a visceral sensuality that frequently devolves into nausea and frustration
Spiritual Apocalypse: Contrasting the clinical realism of the era, the "poetry of the Spirit" remains vital
Language and Style
To authentically capture the modern Indian experience, these poets subjected the English language to rigorous experimentation:
Linguistic Subversion: Writers like Anita Desai advocated for kicking against accepted syntax and the "waistcoated correctness" of English to turn it into a living "dialect of the mind"
Fractured Syntax: This subversion is highly visible in Kamala Das’s habit of splitting phrases and infinitives across lines to reflect a fractured sensibility, as well as in Pritish Nandy’s typographical aberrations and deliberate illogic
Clinical and Conversational Ease: Rejecting grand epic pronouncements, poets like Ezekiel and Parthasarathy favored conversational ease, bare statements, and a clipped, surgical style to deliver immediate and vital observations
Shahid Suhrawardy is included in the classroom anthology as a modernist or early modernist poet, with Essays in Verse (1937) associated with his work. His poetry reflects an early movement away from conventional poetic expression towards a more intellectualized and formally experimental mode.
A representative snippet discussed in the classroom material is:
“With hands thrust in my abysmal pocket
and watch dwindling eyesight sink in maddened sockets,
as you would say from inch to inch.”
The passage presents a striking image of the speaker's physical and psychological condition. Expressions such as “abysmal pocket” and “dwindling eyesight” create a sense of darkness, decline, and inward uncertainty. The image of eyesight gradually “sink[ing]” into “maddened sockets” gives the passage an intense psychological dimension. Rather than presenting experience through conventional romantic idealization, the poet employs unusual imagery and intellectualized expression to communicate a troubled modern consciousness.
Thus, Suhrawardy's inclusion in the anthology can be understood through the features of formal experimentation, unusual imagery, intellectualized expression, and psychological intensity. His poetry represents an early stage in the development of the modernist sensibility that becomes more prominent in later Indian English poets.
P. R. Kaikini
P. R. Kaikini is associated in the classroom anthology with Songs of a Wanderer (1936). His poetry represents a connection between an earlier romantic sensibility and the emerging modernist consciousness. His work can therefore be read as reflecting a transitional stage in the development of Indian English poetry.
A representative snippet discussed in the classroom material is:
“Yesterday, when my young heart went to bed
it was full of joy, life, love and hope.”
The passage presents the youthful heart through the language of joy, love, life, and hope. The emotional and idealistic vocabulary reflects the influence of the romantic tradition, particularly its emphasis on youthful feeling and positive emotional experience. At the same time, the focus on the inner emotional world of the individual connects the passage with the growing importance of personal experience and self-expression in modern Indian poetry.
Thus, Kaikini's place in the classroom anthology is significant for understanding the transition from romantic inheritance towards modernist tendencies. His poetry provides a useful point of comparison with the later New Poets, whose work increasingly questions idealism and engages with the complexities and uncertainties of modern experience.
Jayanta Mahapatra
Jayanta Mahapatra is represented through his collection Relationship (1980). His poetry brings regional experience into modern Indian English poetry. The landscape is not presented merely as picturesque scenery; instead, it becomes a space through which questions of hunger, mortality, poverty, memory, and existential uncertainty can be explored.
A representative snippet from the poem is:
“Every man, every beast trapped deaf in his own sleep…”
The image of “every man” and “every beast” being “trapped” in their own sleep creates a powerful sense of isolation and helplessness. The word “trapped” suggests confinement, while the description of sleep as “deaf” implies an inability to hear or respond to the suffering surrounding them. Human beings and animals are placed together, suggesting a shared condition of vulnerability and unconsciousness.
The passage therefore moves beyond a simple description of the landscape. The physical setting becomes a reflection of a deeper existential condition, where individuals appear isolated within their own worlds. This treatment of human and natural life contributes to Mahapatra's regional realism and existential irony. The sacred landscape is consequently presented alongside the darker realities of human existence, allowing the poet to question idealized representations of place, spirituality, and life.
Thus, Mahapatra's poetry demonstrates how the New Poets transform regional experience into a means of exploring mortality, suffering, isolation, and existential uncertainty. His modernism emerges through the tension between the sacred landscape and the difficult realities that inhabit it.
A. K. Ramanujan
A. K. Ramanujan's The Striders (1966) is represented through the well-known poem “A River.” His poetry demonstrates the interaction between personal experience, cultural memory, and Indian literary traditions.
A representative snippet from the poem is:
“In Madurai, city of temples and poets
who sang of cities and temples, every summer
a river dries to a trickle in the sand
baring the sand ribs, straw and women’s hair
clogging the watergates at the rusty bars.”
In “A River,” the river is not treated simply as a beautiful natural object. The description of the drying river, “sand ribs,” straw, and women’s hair presents the harsh physical reality of the landscape. Ramanujan contrasts this reality with the traditional image of Madurai as a “city of temples and poets,” creating irony between inherited poetic descriptions and contemporary lived experience.
The poem's treatment of the river therefore becomes a critique of the tendency to romanticise nature while ignoring human suffering. This creates an important modernist tension between poetic tradition and lived reality.
Ramanujan's poetry therefore illustrates how the New Poets can use familiar Indian cultural and natural imagery while simultaneously questioning inherited poetic conventions.
Arun Kolatkar
Arun Kolatkar's Jejuri (1976), particularly “A Scratch,” represents another significant form of Indian modernism. Kolatkar combines visual imagery, colloquial diction, ordinary objects, and religious scepticism.
A representative snippet from the poem is:
“What is god
and what is stone
the dividing line
if it exists
is a scratch
on the stone.”
The poet questions the distinction between the sacred and the ordinary through the simple images of “god” and “stone.” The question “What is god / and what is stone” directly challenges the conventional belief that a sacred object is fundamentally different from an ordinary stone. The “scratch” becomes an important image because it suggests that the boundary between the sacred and the material may be extremely thin or even uncertain.
The poem therefore presents religious scepticism through ordinary physical details rather than through abstract philosophical argument. Kolatkar does not simply reject religion; instead, he questions how objects become sacred and how people perceive them as divine. The tension between faith and doubt, sacredness and material reality creates an ironic modernist perspective.
Kolatkar's poetry therefore demonstrates how mythology and religious tradition can be brought into contact with modern scepticism and everyday experience. His modernism lies in questioning inherited religious assumptions while observing the physical world with a sharp, detached eye.
R. Parthasarathy
R. Parthasarathy is represented through Rough Passage (1977). His place within the anthology is associated with exile, linguistic alienation, and homecoming.
A representative snippet from Rough Passage is: (Additional)
“I have learnt to live
with the English language
but it is not my own.”
This reflects the poet’s experience of linguistic and cultural displacement. English becomes both a medium of expression and a reminder of the colonial history that separates the poet from his native linguistic traditions.
Language itself therefore becomes an important part of the experience of exile and homecoming. The poet’s relationship with English raises questions about cultural belonging, identity, and the difficulty of expressing oneself when caught between different linguistic and cultural worlds.
Thus, Parthasarathy’s poetry contributes to the anthology’s larger concern with Indian self-expression in English. His modernism emerges from the tension between English as a chosen literary language and the poet’s desire to reconnect with his Indian linguistic and cultural roots.
Keki N. Daruwalla
Keki N. Daruwalla is represented through Under Orion (1970) and Crossing of Rivers (1976). His poetry is associated with violence, history, landscape, and unsentimental realism.
A representative aspect of Daruwalla’s poetry is his treatment of landscape not as a beautiful or romantic background, but as a space marked by conflict, suffering, and historical violence.
Unlike a romantic treatment of landscape, Daruwalla's poetry can use landscape as a site where history and violence become visible. His modernist perspective emerges through an unsentimental confrontation with reality.
Thus, Daruwalla contributes to the anthology by demonstrating how landscape can become a record of violence and history, reflecting the darker and more complex realities of human existence.
Dilip Chitre
Dilip Chitre is represented through Travelling in a Cage and Says Tuka, with “Determined to Tell Lies” discussed in the classroom material.
Chitre's importance lies particularly in his position as a bilingual poet. His poetry brings questions of translation, language, identity, and cultural movement into the discussion of Indian modernism.
His bilingualism is significant because Indian English poetry does not exist independently of India's multilingual literary culture. Translation and linguistic movement become part of the poet's experience of self-expression and identity.
Thus, Chitre's poetry contributes to the anthology by showing how language itself can become a site of cultural negotiation, reflecting the complex relationship between Indian languages and English.
Imtiaz Dharker
Imtiaz Dharker is represented through Postcards from god (1997), particularly “Postcards from God (1).” Her poetry introduces concerns of diaspora, gender, faith, and displacement.
A representative feature of her poetry is the questioning of established ideas about God, religion, identity, and women's experience. Her poetic voice often combines compressed imagery and irony to examine the relationship between the individual and social or religious structures.
Her inclusion also demonstrates that the classroom anthology extends beyond a narrowly defined historical modernism. Although she may be described broadly as a contemporary or postmodern voice, her poetry shares modernist strategies such as fragmentation, irony, compressed imagery, and the questioning of established structures.
Thus, Dharker contributes a later dimension to the anthology, showing how questions of gender, faith, displacement, and identity continue to reshape Indian poetic expression.
Conclusion
The New Poets transformed Indian English poetry by combining modernist experimentation with distinctly Indian experiences. Their poetry questions inherited traditions while aging with identity, language, religion, history, displacement, and social realities. Collectively, they demonstrate the richness and complexity of modern Indian consciousness.
Explain this statement made by K. R. S. Iyengar regarding the New Poets: "An Indo-Anglian poet strives for self-expression in English." Discuss any 3 poets whose works can justify this observation.
K. R. S. Iyengar’s assertion that "An Indo-Anglian poet strives for self-expression in English" captures the transformation of post-independence Indian poetry in English from derivative imitation to authentic personal and cultural articulation
Moving away from colonial models and sentimental romanticism, these poets embrace concrete realism, navigate bilingual tensions, and utilize English often Indianized to explore individual subjectivity, social disruption, and regional roots
The works of A. K. Ramanujan, Jayant Mahapatra, and Arun Kolatkar illustrate how English serves as an authentic instrument for self-expression within the Indian context
A. K. Ramanujan: Memory, Heritage, and Dual Consciousness
A. K. Ramanujan a prominent 1960s poet, scholar, linguist, folklorist, and translator exemplifies how an Indo-Anglian poet can forge English into a flexible vehicle for expressing an intensely Indian internal consciousness
Poetic Technique and Indian Poetics: Ramanujan’s poetry is recognized for its economy of expression, lyrical quality, subtle rhythmic control, and deep awareness of Hindu heritage
Exploration of Lineage and Memory: In collections such as The Striders (1966), Relations (1972), Second Sight (1986), and The Collected Poems (1995), Ramanujan uses English to interrogate his past, family relations, ancestral lineage, and generational irony
Subversion in "A River": In his poem "A River", set in Madurai ("city of temples and poets"), Ramanujan subverts the romanticized tradition of celebrating holy rivers
Jayant Mahapatra: Regional Ethos and Existential Solitude
Jayant Mahapatra utilizes English to capture the landscape, cultural ethos, and social realities of Odisha, transforming localized regional experiences into universal meditations on human frailty and spiritual disquiet
Sensibility and Social Awareness: Regarded as a close observer of human existence, Mahapatra’s poetry features sharp lyrics and emotional notes deeply rooted in nature
Philosophical Outlook: Mahapatra maintained that poems are meant to be shared like love or happiness, yet his writing frequently confronts isolation, pain, and mortality capturing the feeling that "Every man, every beast trapped, permanent deaf in his own sleep..."
Tragic Realism in "Dawn at Puri": In major works like Relationship (1981), Waiting, A Rain of Rites, and Life Signs, Mahapatra documents India's physical and spiritual desolation
Arun Kolatkar: Modernist Skepticism and Anti-Romanticism
Arun Kolatkar, a bilingual poet writing in Marathi and English who was central to the Bombay "Little Magazine" movement of the 1960s and 1970s, shows how an Indo-Anglian poet achieves self-expression through defiance, dark wit, and non-conformity
Rejection of Romantic Orthodoxy: Kolatkar rejects romantic nationalism and fragmented religious sentiment
Deconstruction in "Jejuri": In his Commonwealth Poetry Prize-winning collection Jejuri (1976), Kolatkar chronicles a visit to a temple town dedicated to the deity Khandoba
Existential Inquiry in "Scratch": In poems such as "Scratch", Kolatkar directly challenges orthodoxy by questioning the boundary between stone and divinity: "What is god / And what is stone / the dividing line / if it exists at all / is very thin at jejuri..."
These three poets validate K. R. S. Iyengar's observation by demonstrating that writing in English does not require an Indo-Anglian poet to detach from their native environment
Jayanta Mahapatra’s poem “Hunger” is a stark, deeply unsettling exploration of human desperation, set against the coastal landscape of Odisha.
Drawing from critical insights and close textual analysis, here is a detailed critical analysis of the poem, utilizing its key lines and metaphors.
The Burden of Conscience and the Fisherman’s Offer
“It was hard to believe the flesh was heavy on my back.
The fisherman said: Will you have her, carelessly,
trailing his nets and his nerves, as though his words
sanctified the purpose with which he faced hims
elf. I saw his white bone thrash his ey
es.”
The poem opens with a psychological and physical burden (“the flesh was heavy on my back”).
Initially, it feels like a heavy load or luggage, but it soon reveals the heavy weight of the speaker’s own guilt, raw lust, and moral unease. The fisherman casually offers his daughter for prostitution (“Will you have her, carelessly”). The phrase "trailing his nets and his nerves" highlights the exhaustion of a man broken by poverty. The fisherman speaks as if his transactional, immoral proposition is a normal, sacred transaction (“as though his words / sanctified the purpose”).
The image of "his white bone thrash his eyes" projects extreme poverty, starvation, and physical decay, showing a man so emaciated that his very skeleton seems to fight against his wretched reality.
The Internal Turmoil and the Walk to the Shack
“I followed him across the sprawling sands,
my mind thumping in the flesh’s sling.
Hope lay perhaps in burning the house I lived in.
Silence gripped my sleeves; his body clawed at the froth
his old nets had only dragged up from the seas.”
The speaker follows the fisherman, driven by an overwhelming sexual urge, while his mind throbs frantically (“my mind thumping in the flesh’s sling,” comparing the skin/body to a medical sling supporting a broken or strained entity).
The line "Hope lay perhaps in burning the house I lived in" signifies a deep sense of self-loathing, sin, and a desperate desire for purification or total destruction of his current bourgeois life.
The sea nets have "only dragged up from the seas" mere froth and meager survival, symbolizing how the fisherman’s lifetime of labor yields nothing, forcing him into moral degradation just to stay alive.
Setting the Scene: The Stifling Atmosphere of Sin
“In the flickering dark his hut opened like a wound.
The wind was I, and the days and nights before.
Palm fronds scratched my skin. Inside the shack
an oil lamp splayed the hours bunched to those walls.
Over and over the sticky soot crossed the space of my min
d.”
Mahapatra uses brilliant sensory imagery here. The fisherman’s hut is personified as "a wound" in the darkness—bleeding, painful, and raw.
The scratching palm fronds act almost metaphorically as a deterrent, a natural barrier trying to stop the speaker from committing a moral transgression.
Inside, the "oil lamp splayed the hours" traps time and space within the stifling poverty of the room. The "sticky soot" crossing the space of the speaker's mind serves as a traditional poetic symbol of sin, moral blackness, and psychological contamination.
The Climax: A Father’s Wile and Two Kinds of Hunger
“I heard him say: My daughter, she’s just turned fifteen…
Feel her. I’ll be back soon, your bus leaves at nine.
The sky fell on me, and a father’s exhausted wile.”
The tragedy intensifies when the father reveals the girl is "just turned fifteen"—a stark age representing the intersection of lost childhood, vulnerability, and sexual commodification.
The father’s command (“Feel her. I’ll be back soon”) exposes the chilling reality of human trafficking driven by poverty, where a parent acts as a pimp out of sheer desperation. The speaker feels crushed (“The sky fell on me”) by the realization of this calculated, exhausted manipulation (“a father’s exhausted wile”).
The Concluding Realization
“Long and lean, her years were cold as rubber.
She opened her wormy legs wide. I felt the hunger there,
the other one, the fish slithering, turning inside.”
The final lines present the fifteen-year-old girl not as an object of romantic or passionate desire, but as a malnourished, mechanical victim (“cold as rubber,” lacking warmth or life).
When "She opened her wormy legs wide," the imagery evokes deep pity and disgust, emphasizing her degradation and insect-like lowliness under the weight of systemic poverty. In the final revelation, the speaker recognizes "the hunger there, / the other one, the fish slithering, turning inside." This brings the poem to its thematic core:
The speaker's hunger is purely sexual, a hedonistic craving.
The girl and her father's hunger is primordial—the hunger of the belly, of starvation, and the desperate struggle for mere biological survival.
As highlighted in critical analyses, Mahapatra does not merely judge the individuals involved; rather, he exposes how socio-economic injustice and crushing poverty strip humans of their dignity.
"Indian Summer"
"Indian Summer" is one of Jayanta Mahapatra’s most masterfully crafted short poems. Known for its exact imagery, deceptively simple diction, and compactness, the poem captures the oppressive atmosphere of an Indian summer while weaving together public rituals, natural landscapes, and intimate domestic spaces.
The Macro-Landscape: Public Chaos, Heat, and Ritual
Over the soughing of the sombre wind priests chant louder than ever;
the mouth of India opens. Crocodiles move into deeper waters.
The Atmosphere of Desperation: The poem opens with a melancholy, dreary sound (“soughing of the sombre wind”). In response to the scorching heat and existential stress, “priests chant louder than ever,” highlighting a collective turning toward religious ritual and spiritual desperation.
The "Mouth of India": Line 3 introduces a potent, haunting image: “the mouth of India opens.” This personification suggests a collective hunger, exhaustion, or supplication—a nation opening its mouth either to gasp for breath against the heat or to voice a deep, existential plea for relief.
Natural Retreat: The “crocodiles moving into deeper waters” serves as a striking natural metaphor. Just as wild predators retreat from the intense heat into cooler, hidden depths, human instincts and ancient terrors also retreat or submerge themselves under the oppressive climate.
Decay, Mortality, and the External Environment
Mornings of heated middens smoke under the sun.
Refuse and Decay: The word “middens” (refuse or garbage heaps) evokes images of literal and metaphorical waste. Heated by the brutal sun, these heaps smoke under the glaring light, symbolizing physical decay, the passage of time, and the relentless pressure of mortality.
This public sphere outside is saturated with a sense of stagnation, waste, and impending doom.
The Micro-Landscape: The Private World and the "Good Wife"
The good wife lies in my bed through the long afternoon; dreaming still, unexhausted by the deep roar of funeral pyres.
The Domestic Contrast: Mahapatra shifts sharply from the chaotic, decaying outdoor world to a private, indoor sanctuary. The “good wife” carries heavy cultural resonance, representing traditional endurance, loyalty, and silent resilience.
Stasis and Time: Lying in bed through the “long afternoon,” she embodies the heavy monotony of time and the stasis forced by the unyielding heat.
Resilience Amidst Death: The poem culminates in a chilling juxtaposition: she remains “unexhausted / by the deep roar of funeral pyres.” While death is omnipresent and audibly near (symbolized by the continuous cremations), the wife continues to dream. This highlights an extraordinary psychological and spiritual fortitude the quiet capacity of the human spirit (and a deeply ingrained Indian philosophical acceptance of mortality) to maintain inner peace and continue living amidst external chaos and decay.
Juxtaposition: Mahapatra’s signature technique is brilliantly on display here. He effortlessly juxtaposes the external (the scorching sun, smoking middens, chanting priests, and roaring funeral pyres) with the internal (the quiet bedroom, the resting wife, and her private dreams).
Thematic Depth: The physical heat of the summer serves as an objective correlative for broader existential conditions—spiritual hunger, human suffering, and the inevitability of death. Yet, rather than ending on a note of absolute despair, the poem lingers on a poignant resilience: life, memory, and dreams persist even under the shadow of the pyre.
Jayanta Mahapatra’s “Dawn at Puri” is one of his most celebrated and anthologized works.
Here is a critical analysis of the poem, breaking down its major movements and imagery:
The Macabre Awakening: Crows, Skulls, and Hunger
Endless crow noises.
A skull in the holy sands
tilts its empty country towards hunger.
The poem begins with an auditory assault—the unceasing cawing of crows, which immediately establishes a macabre atmosphere associated with death and scavenging.
The image of a “skull in the holy sands” juxtaposes the sacredness of Puri with the brutal reality of death and destitution. The phrase “tilts its empty country towards hunger” personifies the skull, transforming the dead person's remains into an entire nation or landscape consumed by systemic poverty, deprivation, and physical starvation.
The Trapped Faith of the Widows
White-clad widowed Women
past the centers of their lives
are waiting to enter the Great Temple.
Their austere eyes
stare like those caught in a net
hanging by the dawn’s shining strands of faith.
Mahapatra shifts focus to elderly, white-clad Hindu widows who have moved past the prime ("centers") of their lives.
Stripped of societal pleasures, they wait outside the Great Temple. Their “austere eyes” are compared to fish “caught in a net,” symbolizing how they are trapped—not just by patriarchal social customs, but by the psychological and spiritual net of religion.
Yet, they hold on, “hanging by the dawn’s shining strands of faith.” Faith here is depicted as a double-edged sword: it offers a fragile lifeline of hope, but it also binds them to an endless cycle of endurance and resignation.
Physical Decay and the Internal Epiphany
The frail early light catches
ruined, leprous shells leaning against one another,
a mass of crouched faces without names,
and suddenly breaks out of my hide
into the smoky blaze of a sullen solitary pyre.
The morning light does not bring a sense of glorious rebirth; instead, it exposes ugliness and decay—“ruined, leprous shells” and anonymous, destitute human beings huddled together.
Suddenly, the external scene triggers an internal psychological break (“breaks out of my hide”).
The speaker’s gaze fixes on a “smoky blaze of a sullen solitary pyre,” bringing the inescapable reality of death directly into the foreground.
The Mother’s Wish and the Shifting Sands of Belief
that fills my aging mother:
her last wish to be cremated here.
twisting uncertainly like light
on the shifting sands.
The cremation pyre reminds the speaker of his aging mother’s traditional desire to die and be cremated on the sacred sands of Puri to attain salvation.
However, the final lines introduce profound doubt.
Her desire is described as “twisting uncertainly like light / on the shifting sands.” Just like physical light and sand dunes shift constantly with the wind, human faith, certainty, and life itself are unstable.
In "Dawn at Puri," Mahapatra masterfully uses sharp, imagistic strokes to question the boundary between the sacred and the profane.
Other Poems
Conclusion
Jayanta Mahapatra’s poetry presents a powerful vision of human suffering, poverty, mortality, identity, and spiritual uncertainty. Through poems such as “Hunger,” “Indian Summer,” and “Dawn at Puri,” he exposes the contradictions between tradition and reality, faith and doubt, and human dignity and social deprivation. His sparse language, vivid imagery, and juxtaposition of external landscapes with inner experiences make his poetry deeply introspective and socially critical. Ultimately, Mahapatra transforms ordinary Indian realities into profound meditations on human vulnerability, memory, identity, and the inevitability of death.
Write a note on A. K. Ramanujan and Arun Kolatkar as new poets and discuss the ways in which they portray nature and myth in their poetry.
Introduction
A. K. Ramanujan and Arun Kolatkar belong to the generation of poets who, alongside Nissim Ezekiel and Jayanta Mahapatra, shaped the foundations of modern Indian English poetry. Writing in the decades after independence, both poets moved away from the ornamental, Romantic-influenced verse of earlier Indian English writing and developed a leaner, more ironic, and intellectually rigorous style. What unites them most distinctly, however, is their shared preoccupation with myth and nature though each treats these elements in strikingly different ways, shaped by their own cultural and personal vantage points.
A. K. Ramanujan: Myth as Irony, Nature as Kinship
Ramanujan, a scholar, folklorist, and translator fluent in Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, Sanskrit, and English, brought a rare, layered cultural fluency into his poetry. Critics note that he uses myths, legends, and rituals "to varied use," enriching the texture of his verse by setting the ideal (as preserved in myth) against the actual (the messiness of lived experience). Importantly, Ramanujan does not treat myth reverently or nostalgically. Scholarship on his work observes that he underlines the sterility of myth in the contemporary world through irony and a mocking tone unlike traditional poets who affirm myth's life-giving power, Ramanujan remains aware of myth's symbolic weight while refusing to accept it uncritically.
This approach is visible in poems like "A River," which draws on both Hindu and Greek mythological traditions. Critics argue that Ramanujan uses these mythological allusions to deepen the poem's meditation on continuity, change, and cultural memory the river becomes a symbol that carries both literal, physical reality (flooding, drought) and symbolic, mythic resonance (life, death, rebirth), and Ramanujan exposes the gap between poetic tradition's celebration of the river and its actual, often destructive presence in people's lives.
Alongside myth, nature occupies an equally central place in Ramanujan's poetry but here critics emphasize kinship rather than irony. Analyses of poems like "Snakes," "The Striders," and "A River" point to Ramanujan's intimate, almost animist relationship with the non-human world birds, insects, snakes, and rivers appear not as decorative backdrops but as active presences bound up with human emotion, memory, and identity. Some scholars frame this through an ecocritical lens, noting that Ramanujan's poetry reveals nature simultaneously as a dwelling place of the sacred, a source of human suffering, and something fundamentally mysterious and elusive a triad that reflects the poet's refusal to romanticize the natural world even as he remains drawn to it.
Arun Kolatkar: Myth Under Scrutiny, Nature as Witness
Kolatkar, a bilingual poet writing in both Marathi and English, is best known for Jejuri (1976), a sequence of thirty-one poems that won the Commonwealth Poetry Prize. Jejuri recounts a visit to a real pilgrimage town in Maharashtra, home to a temple dedicated to the local god Khandoba.
Where Ramanujan often treats myth as an inherited cultural inheritance to be turned over and questioned from within, Kolatkar approaches myth as an outsider-observer his poetic persona is described by critics as a "modern urban sceptic" who arrives at Jejuri not as a devotee but as a secular visitor confronting a "barren, desolated and ruined place" rather than a site of spiritual transcendence.
This scepticism produces a poetry of conflict between myth and reality, faith and doubt. Scholars characterize Jejuri as staging a direct tension between the legendary, miraculous stories surrounding Khandoba (a god believed to have slain demons and, in local legend, his own wife in a fit of rage) and the physical, often shabby reality of the temple town itself its decaying stone, its priests going through the motions, its half-hearted rituals.
One critical reading goes so far as to argue that Kolatkar's poems constitute an outright "denial and disbelief," debunking not just the specific legends of Khandoba but the broader human tendency to let myths "acquire a stronger and still stronger hold" over generations, regardless of their factual basis.
Nature in Kolatkar's work functions differently from Ramanujan's rather than kinship, it often serves as ironic counterpoint. Descriptions of natural landscape (parched hills, the sun on stone, insects, small creatures underfoot) are woven into the pilgrimage narrative to puncture the town's claims to sanctity, exposing the mismatch between religious expectation and physical, sensory reality.
Critics note that Kolatkar blends natural description with harsh realism and scepticism, using observational, almost cinematic detail (a technique some compare to montage, given his early ambitions in filmmaking) to let the reader see through the myth rather than be told to disbelieve it outright.
Comparative Perspective: Two Approaches to a Shared Concern
Though both poets interrogate myth rather than affirm it, their methods diverge in instructive ways:
- Ramanujan works from within a mythological and folkloric tradition he knows intimately as a scholar his irony is that of someone measuring inherited myth against personal and communal experience, often blurring the line between critique and elegy.
- Kolatkar works from outside, adopting the stance of the sceptical modern visitor his irony is more satirical and observational, built through the accumulation of physical detail rather than through mythological erudition.
Similarly, their treatment of nature reflects this difference: Ramanujan's natural world is porous and intimate, almost an extension of the self, while Kolatkar's is a stage on which human belief systems are tested and often found wanting.
Conclusion
As "new poets" in the Indian English tradition, Ramanujan and Kolatkar helped redefine what Indian poetry in English could do moving from imitation of Western Romantic and Victorian modes toward a distinctly modern, ironic, and regionally rooted sensibility. Their shared engagement with myth and nature, though executed through different techniques (Ramanujan's folkloric irony versus Kolatkar's sceptical realism), reflects a broader postcolonial project: using inherited cultural material not to celebrate tradition uncritically, but to interrogate its continued relevance in a rapidly modernizing India.
Annayat, Rasak. “A Brief Survey of Indian English Poetry.” INSIGHT Journal of Applied Research in Education, vol. 24, no. 1, 2019, pp. 323–330. University of Kashmir, https://education.uok.edu.in/Files/4f96dde9-9a35-46c7-9b3e-c80291ed5689/Journal/ad203174-5e70-454f-a5e2-4b30a714f19f.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Dubey, Bijay Kant. “Critiquing for the Third Time, Dawn at Puri by Jayanta Mahapatra.” ResearchGate, Nov. 2023, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375933732_Critiquing_For_The_Third_Time_Dawn_At_Puri_by_Jayanta_Mahapatra. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Dutta, Amar. “Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri: A Conflict between Myth and Reality, Faith and Scepticism.” postScriptum: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2018, pp. 118–129. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1318930. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Gupta, Saurabh. “Mahapatra’s Poem, The Whorehouse in a Calcutta Street, Critical Analysis.” Indo-Anglian Poetry, 25 Dec. 2022
Iyengar, K. R. Srinivasa. Indian Writing in English. 5th ed., Sterling Publishers, 1985.
Mahato, Amar Shankar. “Mythology and Symbolism in A.K. Ramanujan’s Poem ‘A River.’” Current Perspectives in Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, pp. 32–39. https://doi.org/10.46303/cuper.2023.4. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Mambrol, Nasrullah. “The Poetry of Arun Kolatkar.” Literary Theory and Criticism, 20 June 2025, https://literariness.org/2025/06/20/the-poetry-of-arun-kolatkar/. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Raj, S. Sushma, C. V. Padmaja, and P. Sreenivasulu Reddy. “Ecological and Feministic Concern in the Poetry of A. K. Ramanujan.” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 8, no. 11, 2019, pp. 3198–3202. Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/145016507/Ecological_And_Feministic_Concern_In_The_Poetry_Of_AK_Ramanujan. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Roy, Rabi Kanta. “Imagery in the Poetry of Jayanta Mahapatra: A Study.” The Indian Review of World Literature in English, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2019, https://www.worldlitonline.net/jan_2019_vol_15/jan_2019_article_4.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Sarkar, Jaydip, and Shirsendu Mondal, editors. Contemporary Indian Poetry in English. Authorspress, 2015, https://www.mahitoshnm.ac.in/studyMaterial/1347contemporary-indian-poetry-in-english_compress.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Sinha, Mosam. “A Critical Study of Myths and Legends in the Poetry of A. K. Ramanujan.” Express, an International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 1–15. Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/9179527/A_CRITICAL_STUDY_OF_MYTHS_AND_LEGENDS_IN_THE_POETRY_OF_A_K_RAMANUJAN_Dr_Mosam_Sinha_Associate_Professor_and_Head_Department_of_English_TMIMT_TMU_Moradabad. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
Unit-5 English. IGNOU, 2017. eGyanKosh, https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/22862/1/Unit-5.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug. 2026.
