It is just a draft.. major editing is remaining
Can we consider Wide Sargasso Sea a part of Postcolonial Caribbean literature? If yes, discuss how the Caribbean space is culturally represented in the novel.
Introduction
Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) can be considered a significant work of postcolonial Caribbean literature because it relocates the story of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre from the English colonial centre to the Caribbean world and gives narrative authority to the woman whom Brontë had largely silenced. Rhys transforms Bertha Mason into Antoinette Cosway, a white Creole woman born and raised in the West Indies, and reconstructs the historical, cultural, racial, and psychological conditions that precede her confinement in England. In this sense, the novel is not merely a prequel to Jane Eyre but a postcolonial rewriting of a canonical European text. Scholarship on the novel repeatedly emphasizes this intervention: Eliana Ionoaia describes Rhys's project as transforming the colonial “Other” into a postcolonial self, while Sylvie Maurel argues that Rhys relocates Brontë's suppressed narrative into the West Indies and gives new significance to the previously silenced figure.
The Caribbean, therefore, is not simply the geographical setting of Wide Sargasso Sea. It is the cultural, historical, psychological, and political centre of the novel. Through Jamaica and Dominica, Rhys explores the continuing effects of slavery, emancipation, racial conflict, Creole hybridity, colonial authority, language, memory, and displacement. Alejandro Nadal-Ruiz's study particularly establishes a relationship between Caribbean landscape and the construction of Creole consciousness, showing that Antoinette's changing connection with the landscape corresponds to the development of her identity.
The Caribbean as a Post-Emancipation Colonial Space
The first important feature of the Caribbean in the novel is its representation as a society living in the aftermath of slavery. The abolition of slavery has changed the legal structure of society, but it has not erased the racial and economic divisions created by plantation colonialism. Antoinette's childhood occurs within this unstable social environment. Her family is white but Creole, and therefore occupies an uncertain position between the formerly enslaved population and the English colonial establishment.
Rhys's representation of this society is important because she does not portray emancipation as the complete disappearance of colonial power. Instead, the novel demonstrates how colonial history continues to shape everyday relationships, social identities, and perceptions of belonging. Antoinette's famous question captures this historical uncertainty:
“who I am and where is my country and where do I belong”
The question is not simply personal. It expresses the postcolonial problem of cultural belonging. Antoinette is geographically Caribbean but does not possess a secure social identity within the Caribbean's racial structure; at the same time, she cannot simply become English. Scholarship similarly identifies her as occupying an unstable position between Jamaican and European identities.
Thus, Rhys presents the Caribbean as a post-emancipation space in which colonial structures continue to determine identity.
Caribbean Landscape as Cultural Identity
Perhaps the most distinctive representation of Caribbean space in the novel is Rhys's treatment of landscape. The Caribbean landscape is intensely sensory: gardens, flowers, trees, mountains, rain, heat, colour, smell, and sound repeatedly enter Antoinette's consciousness.
This landscape is not decorative. It participates in the formation of identity. Antoinette's relationship with the Caribbean environment changes throughout the novel, and these changes correspond to changes in her sense of self. Alejandro Nadal-Ruiz argues precisely that the novel establishes a relationship between place, memory, and Creole identity, with Antoinette's connection and disconnection from Caribbean nature reflecting the development of her Creole consciousness.
Antoinette's attachment to the landscape is expressed through her statement:
“This is my place and this is where I belong and this is where I wish to stay.”
The significance of “my place” is greater than physical ownership. The landscape provides Antoinette with a cultural vocabulary through which she understands herself. Place becomes identity.
A recent study likewise argues that Rhys uses colour, scent, sound, and other sensory experiences to construct Caribbean consciousness and to establish Antoinette's complicated relationship with place, race, and memory.
Coulibri: Home, History, and Displacement
The representation of Coulibri develops this relationship between landscape and identity. As Antoinette's childhood home, Coulibri initially signifies family, memory, belonging, and familiarity. Yet the estate is also situated within the history of plantation society and racial conflict.
Its eventual destruction is therefore both a personal and historical event. The destruction of the estate breaks Antoinette's childhood sense of security and contributes to her subsequent displacement. The Caribbean home becomes a reminder that belonging in a colonial society is always vulnerable.
This transformation is central to Rhys's spatial politics. Recent scholarship argues that places such as Coulibri and Granbois are active sites of racial, gendered, and colonial conflict, rather than passive backgrounds to Antoinette's story.
Coulibri consequently represents a paradox: it is Antoinette's home, but it is also a home produced within the unstable structures of colonial society.
Granbois and the Double Image of the Caribbean
The representation of Granbois further complicates the cultural meaning of the Caribbean. To Antoinette, the landscape is intimate and familiar; to Rochester, it appears strange and difficult to comprehend. The difference between their responses to the landscape reveals a deeper conflict between Caribbean cultural consciousness and European colonial perception.
Antoinette's relationship with Granbois demonstrates that the Caribbean cannot be reduced to the European image of a beautiful tropical paradise. Its beauty exists alongside historical violence, racial tension, sexual politics, and psychological insecurity.
This is why the landscape repeatedly possesses a double quality—beautiful yet threatening, familiar yet strange, liberating yet restrictive. The 2026 study of Rhys's spatial politics describes the Caribbean landscape as simultaneously beautiful and terrifying and interprets it as a site where the silenced subject's struggle becomes spatially visible.
The Caribbean is therefore represented neither romantically nor negatively. Rhys presents it as a complex lived cultural space.
Creole Identity and Cultural Hybridity
A central feature of Caribbean culture in the novel is Creole identity. Antoinette is neither comfortably English nor securely positioned within Jamaican society. Her identity is produced through the intersection of European ancestry and Caribbean upbringing.
This makes her a particularly important postcolonial figure. She represents the cultural complexity created by colonialism itself. The novel does not provide a simple opposition between “colonizer” and “colonized”; instead, Antoinette occupies an unstable position between them.
A study applying Homi Bhabha's concept of ambivalence argues that Antoinette's Creole identity emerges from the interaction between colonizer and colonized, but that this unstable identity ultimately becomes associated with her representation as a “madwoman.”
The novel's famous phrase
“white cockroach”
captures this cultural uncertainty. Antoinette is identified through whiteness, yet she is not granted the authority and belonging associated with English identity. Her position demonstrates that colonial identity is not simply a matter of race; it is also a matter of cultural location and power.
The Politics of Naming and Language
Language becomes another means through which Caribbean cultural identity is represented. Rochester's renaming of Antoinette as “Bertha” is particularly significant because naming becomes an act of power.
Antoinette protests:
“Bertha is not my name.”
The statement is brief but fundamental. Her original name carries her personal history and Caribbean identity; “Bertha” is an identity imposed upon her by the English colonial male.
This process can be understood as a form of cultural erasure. Rochester does not merely rename a woman; he attempts to redefine the person she is. Scholarship on Rhys's language similarly argues that the novel challenges standard colonial English by incorporating and reshaping Caribbean linguistic and cultural forms.
Rhys therefore makes language part of the struggle between colonial authority and Caribbean self-definition.
Caribbean Spirituality and Christophine
The cultural representation of the Caribbean also extends to Christophine and obeah. Christophine represents a form of Caribbean cultural knowledge that exists outside Rochester's European worldview. Her presence challenges the assumption that European knowledge is the only legitimate form of knowledge.
Rochester's discomfort with Christophine and Caribbean spiritual practices demonstrates the colonial tendency to classify unfamiliar cultural practices as irrational or primitive. Rhys instead gives these practices a significant position within the Caribbean cultural world of the novel.
Christophine consequently functions as more than a supporting character. She represents an alternative cultural authority and provides Antoinette with a form of protection and understanding that Rochester cannot provide.
“The Other Side”: Rewriting the Colonial Narrative
The most explicitly postcolonial dimension of Wide Sargasso Sea is its rewriting of Jane Eyre. In Brontë's novel, Bertha is largely presented through the perspectives of Jane and Rochester. Her own history and cultural context remain inaccessible.
Rhys directly addresses this absence through the idea of another perspective:
“There is always the other side.”
This sentence can be read as the central principle of Rhys's entire novel. The “other side” is Antoinette's side, the Caribbean side, the Creole side, and the silenced side of the colonial story.
Ionoaia's scholarly discussion makes this point particularly clearly: Rhys's rewriting gives the previously muted Creole woman an opportunity to speak and transforms the colonial “Other” into a postcolonial subject.
Similarly, Maurel argues that Rhys takes the figure of the “unspeakable” woman from Jane Eyre and creates a new narrative space for her through the West Indian setting.
Thus, Rhys is not merely telling Bertha's “backstory.” She is challenging who has the authority to tell Caribbean history.
Caribbean Space and the Problem of Displacement
The movement from the Caribbean to England gives the novel its final spatial and cultural significance. When Antoinette is removed from the Caribbean and taken to England, she loses the geographical environment through which she has understood herself.
Her displacement is therefore simultaneously:
geographical → cultural → psychological → colonial
The Caribbean is associated with memory, sensory experience, and an unstable but meaningful sense of belonging, whereas England becomes the space in which Antoinette is renamed, confined, and transformed into the figure known as Bertha Mason.
The contrast demonstrates that colonialism operates not only through political control of territory but also through control over identity, memory, language, and representation. Recent scholarship describes precisely this spatial opposition between the Caribbean and the English manor as part of Rhys's strategy for exposing colonial power and giving the silenced female subject a resistant voice.
Conclusion
Wide Sargasso Sea can therefore be read as a major postcolonial Caribbean novel because it makes Caribbean space central to the construction of history, culture, and identity. Rhys does not use Jamaica and Dominica merely as exotic settings. Through Coulibri, Granbois, Caribbean gardens, mountains, forests, language, spirituality, and sensory memory, she constructs a world in which place and identity are inseparable.
The novel's Caribbean space is shaped by the historical consequences of slavery and colonialism, yet it cannot be reduced to victimhood. It is also a space of Creole hybridity, cultural memory, resistance, and competing forms of knowledge. Antoinette's question “where is my country and where do I belong” therefore becomes a larger postcolonial question about identity in a society produced through colonial encounter.
Most importantly, Rhys reverses the direction of representation. In Jane Eyre, the Caribbean woman is largely represented from the outside; in Wide Sargasso Sea, she is allowed to represent herself from within her Caribbean cultural world. As the novel insists, “There is always the other side.” That “other side” is precisely what makes Rhys's work postcolonial: she brings the Caribbean landscape, Creole identity, colonial history, and silenced female voice from the margins to the centre of the narrative.
With reference to the critical terms pertaining to postcolonial literature discussed in class, analyze the themes of racism, hybridity and the conflicts of creole identity as depicted in Rhys' novel.
Write a note on Narrative technique employed in Wide Sargasso Sea with reference to William James’ concept of Pragmatism and Pluralist Truth.
Introduction
Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) is remarkable not only because it rewrites Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre from the perspective of the silenced Creole woman, but also because of the sophisticated narrative technique through which this rewriting is achieved. Rhys does not provide the reader with a single, authoritative account of Antoinette’s life. Instead, the narrative moves between Antoinette and Rochester and incorporates memories, dreams, dialogue, letters, reported speech, and the perspectives of secondary characters such as Christophine and Grace Poole. The result is a fragmented and polyphonic narrative in which reality is experienced differently by different consciousnesses. This technique becomes especially interesting when read alongside William James’s pragmatism and his pluralistic understanding of truth. James's pragmatism connects truth with experience, verification, practical consequences, and inquiry, while his pluralistic philosophy resists the reduction of reality to one final, all-encompassing perspective.
The connection between James and Rhys should not, however, be understood as if Rhys were directly illustrating a philosophical theory. Rather, James provides a useful critical framework for understanding what Rhys's narrative form accomplishes. In James's view, an idea becomes true through its relation to experience and through the way it successfully connects different parts of experience; truth is therefore not simply a static possession but something that emerges through processes of verification. Rhys similarly refuses to give us a ready-made truth about Antoinette. Instead, she makes the reader move through several experiences of the same world and construct an understanding from their interaction. Thus, the plural structure of the novel becomes a literary equivalent of Jamesian pluralism: reality is approached through several partial perspectives rather than through one supposedly complete voice.
Multiple Narration and the Rejection of a Single Authoritative Truth
The most important narrative technique in Wide Sargasso Sea is its use of multiple first-person perspectives. Antoinette narrates the first part, Rochester dominates the second, and the narrative returns to Antoinette in the final section, while other voices enter through dialogue, letters, memories, and reported speech. This structure is particularly significant because Rhys is rewriting Jane Eyre, where Bertha Mason has no sustained opportunity to narrate her own experience. In Rhys's novel, the woman who was previously observed from the outside becomes a speaking subject. Antoinette's opening immediately establishes this subjective mode: “The Jamaican ladies had never approved of my mother.” The statement introduces not only Antoinette's personal memory but also the social judgments that have shaped her consciousness. Her story is therefore already situated within a network of competing voices. The narrative does not begin with an objective historical explanation of Annette or Jamaica; it begins with how the world is experienced and remembered by Antoinette.
This technique can be connected to James's pragmatist emphasis on experience. James's philosophy understands knowing as inseparable from human engagement with the world and rejects the assumption that knowledge can simply be detached from the perspective of the knower. Consequently, Rhys's choice of multiple narrators becomes philosophically significant: the reader is not given “the truth” first and then shown individual reactions to it; instead, truth is approached through the different experiences of the characters. Antoinette's experience of Jamaica cannot be completely replaced by Rochester's experience of Jamaica, just as Rochester's interpretation cannot simply erase Antoinette's. The novel therefore establishes from its structure that one perspective cannot exhaust a complex reality.
Antoinette's Narrative and the Truth of Lived Experience
Antoinette's narration is deeply rooted in sensory and emotional experience. Her understanding of the Caribbean is constructed through landscapes, colours, smells, sounds, memories, dreams, and relationships rather than through abstract descriptions. Her statement, “This is my place and this is where I belong and this is where I wish to stay,” is therefore more than an expression of affection for Granbois. It represents her attempt to define herself through the place she experiences as home. The words “my place” and “where I belong” connect geography directly with identity. The Caribbean is not simply where Antoinette happens to live; it is part of the experiential foundation of her sense of self.
This is particularly relevant to James's pragmatism because James gives experience a central role in determining how human beings understand reality. His account of truth stresses that ideas become true insofar as they establish satisfactory relations with other parts of experience. Antoinette's understanding of herself therefore cannot be separated from her experience of Caribbean space. Her later question, “who I am and where is my country and where do I belong,” reveals what happens when that experiential relationship becomes unstable. The question is simultaneously geographical, cultural, racial, and psychological. Antoinette's truth is not a simple proposition about nationality; it is an unresolved experience of belonging. Rhys's narrative technique allows the reader to encounter this uncertainty from inside Antoinette's consciousness, rather than merely receiving an external explanation of it.
Rochester's Narrative: Another Experience of the Same Reality
The introduction of Rochester's first-person narrative in Part Two is crucial because Rhys does not simply replace one authoritative narrative with another. She gives Rochester an extended opportunity to interpret Antoinette, the Caribbean, and their relationship from his own perspective. The same landscape that Antoinette understands as intimate and familiar becomes increasingly strange to Rochester. The same woman who understands herself as Antoinette becomes, in his perception, a mysterious and increasingly threatening figure. The narrative consequently makes the reader experience a fundamental difference between what Antoinette lives and what Rochester interprets.
This is where James's pluralism becomes particularly useful. James's pluralistic philosophy allows reality to be approached through different “visions” and modes of experience rather than being reduced to one totalising system. Rochester's narrative is therefore not simply inserted to provide the “correct” explanation of Antoinette. It is another consciousness attempting to make sense of an unfamiliar reality. The importance of this technique lies precisely in the fact that Rochester's interpretation is limited by his position. His English background, patriarchal assumptions, suspicion, and inability to understand Caribbean culture shape what he sees. Rhys thus makes perspective part of the production of meaning: Rochester does not simply describe reality; he constructs a version of reality from within his own experience.
The Caribbean as a Plural Reality
The difference between Antoinette's and Rochester's perspectives is particularly evident in their responses to the Caribbean landscape. Antoinette experiences the natural environment as part of her identity, while Rochester frequently experiences it as excessive, unfamiliar, and difficult to comprehend. The landscape consequently becomes a test of the limits of individual perception. There is not one neutral Caribbean landscape presented independently of human consciousness; there are different experiences of the same landscape.
This narrative strategy corresponds closely to James's pluralism. James's A Pluralistic Universe presents philosophical positions as different “visions” and “modes of feeling” shaped by character and experience. Rhys translates something similar into fiction. The Caribbean exists materially, but its meaning changes according to who experiences it. For Antoinette, Granbois can signify belonging; for Rochester, it can become associated with uncertainty and danger. Rhys does not resolve this difference through an omniscient narrator who announces which perception is universally correct. Instead, she allows the conflict between perspectives to remain visible. This is one of the most sophisticated aspects of her narrative technique because the reader learns about Caribbean space through the tension between competing consciousnesses.
Fragmented Narrative, Memory, and the Flow of Experience
Rhys's narrative is also characterised by fragmentation and non-linear memory. Antoinette's past does not appear as a neatly organised chronological record. Childhood experiences return through images, sensations, dreams, repetitions, and emotional associations. The final section is particularly striking because Antoinette's consciousness moves between memory, dream, and present experience. As she imagines the fire, she says:
“I saw the flames shoot up. As I ran or perhaps floated or flew…”
The uncertainty expressed through “ran or perhaps floated or flew” is important. Rhys deliberately refuses to tell us exactly where physical reality ends and dream or memory begins. Instead, she reproduces the instability of Antoinette's consciousness. The narrative is not simply describing psychological fragmentation from outside; its form becomes fragmented in order to make the reader experience that instability.
This technique can again be related to James's interest in experience as dynamic and continuous rather than as a collection of perfectly separated facts. His radical empiricism emphasises the continuity and relational character of experience. Rhys's fragmented memories operate similarly: the past is not dead information stored neatly in chronological order. It continues to enter the present and alter its meaning. Thus, memory becomes a form of experiential truth. What matters is not only what happened but how the event continues to exist within Antoinette's consciousness.
Unreliable Narration and Jamesian Fallibilism
Another important feature of Rhys's technique is narrative unreliability. Neither Antoinette nor Rochester can be accepted as an absolutely objective narrator. Antoinette's account is affected by childhood memories, trauma, dreams, emotional intensity, and psychological instability, while Rochester's interpretation is shaped by cultural unfamiliarity, jealousy, patriarchal assumptions, and his desire to control Antoinette. The reader is therefore placed in a position of uncertainty. Instead of receiving an authoritative account, we must compare one account with another.
This uncertainty is compatible with the fallibilist dimension of pragmatism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy identifies pragmatism as an epistemological tradition that rejects absolute certainty and treats inquiry as open to correction. Rhys's narrative structure similarly keeps interpretation open. We cannot simply accept Rochester's explanation of Antoinette's “madness,” because Antoinette's own narrative repeatedly complicates it. At the same time, we cannot treat Antoinette's account as an entirely transparent objective record. The reader must investigate, compare, and interpret. In this sense, the reader becomes an inquirer rather than a passive receiver of truth.
“Bertha Is Not My Name”: Competing Truths and the Politics of Identity
The struggle over Antoinette's name provides one of the clearest examples of the relationship between narrative technique and pluralist truth. Rochester attempts to transform Antoinette into “Bertha,” while Antoinette insists:
“Bertha is not my name.”
She immediately identifies the deeper problem:
“You are trying to make me into someone else.”
The conflict over the name is therefore a conflict over who possesses the authority to define reality. Rochester's “Bertha” represents an identity imposed from outside, while Antoinette's “Antoinette” represents her own experienced sense of self. The novel refuses to allow Rochester's version to become the final definition because Rhys has already given Antoinette the narrative authority to speak against it.
This is where James's theory becomes especially illuminating. Pragmatism does not understand truth as an inert statement detached from experience; James describes truth as connected to processes of verification and to the way beliefs successfully relate to experience. Rochester's imposed identity repeatedly clashes with Antoinette's lived experience. The name “Bertha” may function within Rochester's conceptual framework, but it does not successfully account for the person who speaks from within the novel. Antoinette's narrative exposes the inadequacy of Rochester's definition of her.
Christophine and the Presence of Another Cultural Knowledge
Rhys further complicates the narrative through Christophine, whose perspective represents a different cultural and epistemological position. Christophine's understanding of Antoinette and of Caribbean society cannot be comfortably absorbed into Rochester's English worldview. She possesses knowledge that Rochester does not control, particularly in relation to Caribbean cultural practices and Obeah. Her conversations with Rochester therefore introduce a confrontation between different ways of understanding reality.
This is important because Rhys's pluralism is not limited to giving two individual narrators different opinions. It also involves cultural plurality. Antoinette, Rochester, and Christophine inhabit different systems of meaning. What seems irrational or threatening from Rochester's perspective may possess a completely different significance within the Caribbean cultural world. The narrative therefore challenges the assumption that European rationality automatically provides the universal standard by which all other experiences should be judged. Pluralism here becomes a way of recognising that knowledge is culturally situated.
The Reader and the Construction of Meaning
Because Rhys does not provide a final omniscient explanation, the reader must actively construct meaning. We compare Antoinette's memories with Rochester's interpretation; we compare Rochester's claims with Christophine's responses; we compare the Caribbean experience presented in Wide Sargasso Sea with the representation of Bertha in Jane Eyre. The novel's meaning therefore develops through a process of comparison and interpretation.
This makes the reader's activity particularly compatible with Jamesian pragmatism. Pragmatism is fundamentally concerned with inquiry and with the practical consequences of adopting particular interpretations. Rhys turns the reader into an investigator who must ask which explanation can adequately account for the various experiences presented in the novel. The answer cannot be found in one isolated voice. Instead, meaning develops through the relationship among voices. Thus, the novel's narrative technique does not merely represent pluralism as a theme; it makes the reader perform pluralistic interpretation.
“There Is Always the Other Side”: The Central Principle of the Novel
The statement “There is always the other side” can be understood as one of the most appropriate ways of describing Rhys's narrative method. The phrase operates at several levels. At the level of literary history, Wide Sargasso Sea provides the “other side” of Jane Eyre: the Caribbean story behind Bertha Mason. At the level of character, Antoinette's narrative provides the other side of Rochester's interpretation. At the cultural level, Christophine provides a perspective that challenges English colonial assumptions. At the psychological level, memory and dream provide dimensions of experience that cannot be reduced to rational chronological narrative.
This is where Rhys's technique most clearly approaches pluralist truth. Contemporary philosophical discussions define truth pluralism as the position that there can be more than one way of being true, rather than assuming one uniform model applicable to every domain. Rhys's novel similarly demonstrates that the truth of a complicated human situation cannot be captured by one voice alone. However, this should not be misunderstood as saying that all perspectives are equally correct. Rather, Rhys demonstrates that each perspective reveals something that a single perspective would conceal. The narrative becomes richer precisely because it allows those perspectives to remain in tension.
Conclusion
Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea employs multiple narration, shifting focalisation, fragmented chronology, memory, dreams, dialogue, letters, unreliable narration, and competing perspectives to challenge the authority of a single version of reality. These techniques are especially significant when interpreted through William James's concepts of pragmatism and pluralism. James's pragmatism connects truth with experience, inquiry, verification, and practical consequences, while his pluralistic philosophy recognises that reality cannot necessarily be reduced to one comprehensive perspective.
Rhys transforms these philosophical possibilities into narrative form. Antoinette's statement “This is my place and this is where I belong” establishes the truth of lived experience; her question “where is my country and where do I belong” reveals the instability of that experience; Rochester's narration supplies a competing interpretation; Christophine introduces another cultural perspective; and the fragmented final narration makes memory and consciousness themselves part of the problem of truth. The statement “Bertha is not my name” finally exposes the political dimension of narrative: whoever controls the story can attempt to control the identity of the person being represented.
Therefore, the most important connection between James and Rhys lies in the form of the novel itself. Rhys does not present truth as a finished object waiting to be delivered by an omniscient narrator. She makes truth something the reader approaches through experience, comparison, contradiction, inquiry, and multiple perspectives. In this sense, Wide Sargasso Sea can be read as a narrative enactment of pluralist truth: there is no single voice that completely possesses reality, because every perspective reveals only part of a larger and continually unfolding experience.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5116. Accessed 21 Sept. 2026.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11984. Accessed 21 Sept. 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.1987.9936458. Accessed 21 Sept. 2026.
https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/IFR/article/view/7627. Accessed 21 Sept. 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2620833. Accessed 21 Sept. 2026.
